Don’t you think satisfying taste buds is the ultimate goal of human survival? For years together, restaurants have evolved with the needs of people. What emerged as dine-ins during the weekends later transformed into takeaways during working days. Nowadays, restaurants go the extra mile to reach out to potential customers at their places, be it homes or workplaces. With due credit to food delivery platforms, restaurants get to retain customers, stay in the market, and boost their sales substantially.
Food delivery platforms are gaining an irreplaceable place on customers’ smartphones. Apps like UberEats, Zomato, Grubhub, etc., have made lives easier for users by enabling them to enjoy their favorite meals with just a few taps on their smartphones. With the emerging need for doorstep deliveries, fueled by the fears of the COVID-19 pandemic, there cannot be an ideal time for entrepreneurs to roll up their sleeves and rise to the occasion.
A business model lays the foundation for any successful app. It provides a route map of how the app conducts business. Entrepreneurs can customize the business model based on their needs and resources. However, four popular and top-performing business models can make life easier for a food delivery platform. Let’s analyze these models and their pros and cons in this blog. Besides, we’ll also look into the future as to how an UberEats clone can succeed.
The Aggregator model
One of the oldest yet most effective business models is the aggregator model. The pioneer of on-demand services, the taxi platform Uber, is based on this model. In this case, the food delivery platform simply bridges the gap between customers and restaurants. It is the restaurant that takes care of delivery. The app displays multiple restaurants within the delivery distance of users. As soon as the restaurants accept users’ requests, the role of the food delivery platform is done and dusted.
Just so you know, food delivery platforms like JustEat, Foodpanda, etc., work on this model, necessitating their success.
- Third-party platforms need not have a separate delivery chain.
- The process is simple, cost-effective, and demands a minimalistic approach.
- Even entrepreneurs without prior expertise can gain instant traction.
- The model generates relatively less revenue when compared to others.
- Users’ reliability towards the site gets hampered even if the fault lies with the restaurants.
The Integrated delivery model
As the name implies, this model is an updated version of the aggregator model, wherein the food delivery platform takes care of delivery. This way, even restaurants that do not have a delivery chain can sign up with the platform. Gaining a stronghold among the local restaurants is always beneficial for a food delivery platform because it can enhance its user engagement rates. As the responsibility of the UberEats clone app increases, so does its revenue.
Apps like UberEats and Deliveroo are among the many successful platforms based on this model.
- Platforms can join hands with local restaurants.
- By hiring delivery workers from the “gig” economy, a considerable amount of the delivery charges will reach entrepreneurs’ pockets.
- Users’ reliability towards platforms increases with this model.
- The responsibility of a food delivery app increases as the platform takes care of delivery as well.
- The cost of maintaining a delivery chain becomes too high on certain occasions.
The Full-service model
This emerging model involves the role of cloud kitchens or virtual kitchens. The model ensures that the food delivery platforms take care of everything, right from accepting the orders to delivering them to customers’ doorsteps. Virtual kitchens provide only popular and top-performing business models without having the option of dine-in or takeaway. With the increased use of Big Data and Machine Learning in the current world, virtual kitchens can rule the food services sector in the upcoming years.
By collecting data regarding a particular region, food delivery platforms can join hands with virtual restaurants. Data regarding the region’s most popular cuisine, the expected delivery time, etc., can help gain a stronghold in the particular locality.
Apps like RocketFood, Munchery, etc., follow this business model.
- By eliminating the role of restaurants, entrepreneurs can gain maximum income.
- The success rate of this model is high, owing to its dependence on data and facts.
- Accurate delivery timings are very much on the cards as the entire UberEats clone system involves an in-house network.
- The model is relatively new, making both entrepreneurs and customers hesitate.
- Users do not know the place of food production, making them doubt the quality and hygiene standards.
The Single Restaurant model
This model is best suited for restaurants that want to expand their operations online. Restaurants get to manage the display of food products from time to time. This way, they get to supplement the depleting dine-in sales with delivery sales by having an online presence. Moreover, restaurants having multiple branches can utilize this model, making the best use of order management. Managing potential customers by informing them that there is a dedicated app for doorstep food delivery can also help to build a positive brand value.
Apps like Domino’s Pizza, McDonald’s, etc., have attained massive success with this model.
- Restaurants get to manage their customers better with a dedicated app.
- Restaurants can enjoy an additional source of income by having a smartphone application.
- Not many restaurants can manage the cost of building the app.
- Maintaining dine-in and delivery sales during peak hours can make the entire process clumsy, leading to the loss of potential customers.
Things to keep in mind before selecting the Business model
Now that you have familiarized yourself with the different business models, it is time to sit back, weigh your resources, and choose the best-suited one. Here are things to keep in mind before choosing your UberEats clone model:
- Resources, in broader terms, involve multiple aspects like making restaurants sign up with your platform, the potential of maintaining the delivery chain, the team to manage the app post-launch, customer support, etc. Analyzing your resources is the primary constraint.
- Running out of funds is quite common, especially if you do not have a feasible strategy. Opting for a fully integrated model without having the economy of maintaining the delivery chain and cloud kitchens is pointless. Having an eye on your funds can help you eliminate hurdles in the future.
- Your region of operation can have a significant impact on your business model. In a region with popular restaurants, cloud kitchens cannot materialize. Conducting market research and understanding customer expectations through surveys, feedback, etc., can all come in handy.
The Future of Food delivery services
The COVID-19 pandemic is propelling the need for food delivery services among people. With people fearing to step out due to a higher chance of virus contractions, a food delivery platform providing safe doorstep deliveries can top the charts in no time.
Besides, the COVID-19 has made dine-ins out of the picture, at least for a few months now. The pressure of handling expenses, including rent, salaries of staff, etc., is making it increasingly difficult for restaurants to cope with the diminishing sales. Due to their minimum expenditure and flexibility, virtual kitchens could be the ones to watch out for shortly. An UberEats clone with a full-service model can succeed if it can reach out to the right audience at the right time. The right time is inevitably now.
The top-performing business model has the capability of making a food delivery platform go from just ordinary to extraordinary. Each business model has its pros and cons, leaving the decision to the entrepreneurs. Knowing what you have and visualizing what you need can make the whole process simple and straightforward. The COVID-19 situation demands an entrepreneur to step up to the occasion with an UberEats clone. Are you the one?