While you’ve been meticulously slaving away to assure the datacenter you operate is running smoothly, is remaining secure and your costs of operation are kept low, you’ve been letting the most imperative long-term issue quickly emerge: electricity consumption. Sure, keeping an air-tight datacenter facility is highly important for the big picture, yet so is having adequate air flow and maximum utilization of available servers. For example, should an access router stop working, one of its counterparts will pick up the slack, consuming too much energy acting alone. Sure, that may mean that one component is saving energy that is being used by two; however, how long will that singular access router be able to handle double capacities? The most common reason access routers fail is overheating which could have been curtailed by having cooler datacenters. Instead of saving money by cutting off needed air flow from unmanned areas, you’ll spend more replacing parts that are overworking constantly. Again, you’re trying to be proactive, not counterproductive.
TCP communication propels many datacenters across the world which takes place within the nodes. Since TCP is meant for higher latencies and lower bandwidths, datacenters which have equipment of the opposite nature are consuming considerable amounts of unneeded energy, again incurring higher costs and minimizing potential optimum consistency. For example, when you’re casting a receiver, multiple requests are coming in for data. From there, the sender will collaborate with other senders to fulfill the request. In unstable server environments, bottleneck links cause an imminent fall down in the original receiver of the data. This causes network jamming; increasing the buffer sizes in a TCP environment could potentially use even more energy, and larger routers or buffer switches could cost outrageously.
For energy consumption, the TCP issue is minuscule in comparison to the overall datacenter’ lack of adequate ventilation and cooling in place to keep servers from overworking during requests. Hotter environments means that equipment is using considerably larger amounts of energy to perform rather simplistic duties. Many buildings that warehouse the datacenters are not current with electrical codes, causing power surges, ‘fried’ servers and costly repair issues. Networks can run slightly hot so long as they’re equally flexible in nature; IT devices, altogether, account for roughly 59% of each watt that a company purchases each month; they also spend 8% in energy that’s never used. Old wiring, cables that are more beefy than effective and small, unplanned spaces are what cost datacenters more money each year than some payout to their employees.
With energy consumption haunting IT businesses and causing cuts to be made in unnecessary areas of their business, there has to be some form of solution that offers cooling IT datacenters using a means that will alleviate server strain, keep server farms cooled off and levy business expenditures again in the IT firms’ favor. While it seems innovations are light years away from implementation, there are glimpses of new ideas that companies are finding to be effective yet haven’t become mainstream. It may not take rocket science for datacenters to begin saving money immediately on energy costs because many of the common sense ideas that exist are yet to be applied in terms of short-term energy consumption fixes.